L2TP
L2TP (Layer Two Tunneling Protocol)
Within this page
L2TP RFCs (28)
RFC 8159: Keyed IPv6 Tunnel
Proposed Standard- M. Konstantynowicz
- G. Heron
- R. Schatzmayr
- W. Henderickx
- May 2017
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document describes a tunnel encapsulation for Ethernet over IPv6 with a mandatory 64-bit cookie for connecting Layer 2 (L2) Ethernet attachment circuits identified by IPv6 addresses. The encapsulation is based on the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3) over IP and does not use the L2TPv3 control plane.
Abstract
This document describes a tunnel encapsulation for Ethernet over IPv6 with a mandatory 64-bit cookie for connecting Layer 2 (L2) Ethernet attachment circuits identified by IPv6 addresses. The encapsulation is based on the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3) over IP and does not use the L2TPv3 control plane.
RFC 7886: Advertising Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Discriminators in the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3)
Proposed Standard- V. Govindan
- C. Pignataro
- July 2016
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document defines a new Attribute-Value Pair (AVP) that allows L2TP Control Connection Endpoints (LCCEs) to advertise one or more Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Discriminator values using the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol version 3 (L2TPv3).
Abstract
This document defines a new Attribute-Value Pair (AVP) that allows L2TP Control Connection Endpoints (LCCEs) to advertise one or more Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Discriminator values using the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol version 3 (L2TPv3).
RFC 5641: Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3) Extended Circuit Status Values
Proposed Standard- N. McGill
- C. Pignataro
- August 2009
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document defines additional Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3) bit values to be used within the "Circuit Status" Attribute Value Pair (AVP) to communicate finer-grained error states for Attachment Circuits (ACs) and pseudowires (PWs). It also generalizes the Active bit and deprecates the use of the New bit in the Circuit Status AVP, updating RFC 3931, RFC 4349, RFC 4454, RFC 4591, and RFC 4719. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines additional Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3) bit values to be used within the "Circuit Status" Attribute Value Pair (AVP) to communicate finer-grained error states for Attachment Circuits (ACs) and pseudowires (PWs). It also generalizes the Active bit and deprecates the use of the New bit in the Circuit Status AVP, updating RFC 3931, RFC 4349, RFC 4454, RFC 4591, and RFC 4719. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 5611: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol version 3 - Setup of Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM) Pseudowires
Proposed Standard- A. Vainshtein
- S. Galtzur
- August 2009
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document defines extensions to the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol version 3 (L2TPv3) for support of structure-agnostic and structure-aware (Circuit Emulation Service over Packet Switched Network (CESoPSN) style) Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM) pseudowires. Support of structure-aware (Time-Division Multiplexing over IP (TDMoIP) style) pseudowires over L2TPv3 is left for further study. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines extensions to the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol version 3 (L2TPv3) for support of structure-agnostic and structure-aware (Circuit Emulation Service over Packet Switched Network (CESoPSN) style) Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM) pseudowires. Support of structure-aware (Time-Division Multiplexing over IP (TDMoIP) style) pseudowires over L2TPv3 is left for further study. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 5571: Softwire Hub and Spoke Deployment Framework with Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Version 2 (L2TPv2)
Proposed Standard- B. Storer
- C. Pignataro
- M. Dos Santos
- B. Stevant
- L. Toutain
- J. Tremblay
- June 2009
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the framework of the Softwire "Hub and Spoke" solution with the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol version 2 (L2TPv2). The implementation details specified in this document should be followed to achieve interoperability among different vendor implementations. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the framework of the Softwire "Hub and Spoke" solution with the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol version 2 (L2TPv2). The implementation details specified in this document should be followed to achieve interoperability among different vendor implementations. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 5515: Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Access Line Information Attribute Value Pair (AVP) Extensions
Informational- V. Mammoliti
- C. Pignataro
- P. Arberg
- J. Gibbons
- P. Howard
- May 2009
- IETF publication
Abstract
This document describes a set of Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Attribute Value Pair (AVP) extensions designed to carry the subscriber Access Line identification and characterization information that arrives at the Broadband Remote Access Server (BRAS) with L2TP Access Concentrator (LAC) functionality. It also describes a mechanism to report connection speed changes, after the initial connection speeds are sent during session establishment. The primary purpose of this document is to provide a reference for DSL equipment vendors wishing to interoperate with other vendors' products. The L2TP AVPs defined in this document are applicable to both L2TPv2 and L2TPv3. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document describes a set of Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Attribute Value Pair (AVP) extensions designed to carry the subscriber Access Line identification and characterization information that arrives at the Broadband Remote Access Server (BRAS) with L2TP Access Concentrator (LAC) functionality. It also describes a mechanism to report connection speed changes, after the initial connection speeds are sent during session establishment. The primary purpose of this document is to provide a reference for DSL equipment vendors wishing to interoperate with other vendors' products. The L2TP AVPs defined in this document are applicable to both L2TPv2 and L2TPv3. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 4951: Fail Over Extensions for Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) "failover"
Proposed Standard- V. Jain
- August 2007
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) is a connection-oriented protocol that has a shared state between active endpoints. Some of this shared state is vital for operation, but may be volatile in nature, such as packet sequence numbers used on the L2TP Control Connection. When failure of one side of a control connection occurs, a new control connection is created and associated with the old connection by exchanging information about the old connection. Such a mechanism is not intended as a replacement for an active fail over with some mirrored connection states, but as an aid for those parameters that are particularly difficult to have immediately available. Protocol extensions to L2TP defined in this document are intended to facilitate state recovery, providing additional resiliency in an L2TP network, and improving a remote system's layer 2 connectivity. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) is a connection-oriented protocol that has a shared state between active endpoints. Some of this shared state is vital for operation, but may be volatile in nature, such as packet sequence numbers used on the L2TP Control Connection. When failure of one side of a control connection occurs, a new control connection is created and associated with the old connection by exchanging information about the old connection. Such a mechanism is not intended as a replacement for an active fail over with some mirrored connection states, but as an aid for those parameters that are particularly difficult to have immediately available. Protocol extensions to L2TP defined in this document are intended to facilitate state recovery, providing additional resiliency in an L2TP network, and improving a remote system's layer 2 connectivity. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4719: Transport of Ethernet Frames over Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3)
Proposed Standard- R. Aggarwal
- M. Townsley
- M. Dos Santos
- November 2006
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document describes the transport of Ethernet frames over the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3 (L2TPv3). This includes the transport of Ethernet port-to-port frames as well as the transport of Ethernet VLAN frames. The mechanism described in this document can be used in the creation of Pseudowires to transport Ethernet frames over an IP network. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the transport of Ethernet frames over the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3 (L2TPv3). This includes the transport of Ethernet port-to-port frames as well as the transport of Ethernet VLAN frames. The mechanism described in this document can be used in the creation of Pseudowires to transport Ethernet frames over an IP network. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4667: Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Extensions for Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
Proposed Standard- W. Luo
- September 2006
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a standard method for setting up and managing L2TP sessions to tunnel a variety of L2 protocols. One of the reference models supported by L2TP describes the use of an L2TP session to connect two Layer 2 circuits attached to a pair of peering L2TP Access Concentrators (LACs), which is a basic form of Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN). This document defines the protocol extensions for L2TP to set up different types of L2VPNs in a unified fashion. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a standard method for setting up and managing L2TP sessions to tunnel a variety of L2 protocols. One of the reference models supported by L2TP describes the use of an L2TP session to connect two Layer 2 circuits attached to a pair of peering L2TP Access Concentrators (LACs), which is a basic form of Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN). This document defines the protocol extensions for L2TP to set up different types of L2VPNs in a unified fashion. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4591: Frame Relay over Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3)
Proposed Standard- M. Townsley
- G. Wilkie
- S. Booth
- S. Bryant
- J. Lau
- August 2006
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3, (L2TPv3) defines a protocol for tunneling a variety of data link protocols over IP networks. This document describes the specifics of how to tunnel Frame Relay over L2TPv3, including frame encapsulation, virtual-circuit creation and deletion, and status change notification. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3, (L2TPv3) defines a protocol for tunneling a variety of data link protocols over IP networks. This document describes the specifics of how to tunnel Frame Relay over L2TPv3, including frame encapsulation, virtual-circuit creation and deletion, and status change notification. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4454: Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) over Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3)
Proposed Standard- S. Singh
- M. Townsley
- C. Pignataro
- May 2006
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3 (L2TPv3) defines an extensible tunneling protocol to transport layer 2 services over IP networks. This document describes the specifics of how to use the L2TP control plane for Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Pseudowires and provides guidelines for transporting various ATM services over an IP network. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3 (L2TPv3) defines an extensible tunneling protocol to transport layer 2 services over IP networks. This document describes the specifics of how to use the L2TP control plane for Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Pseudowires and provides guidelines for transporting various ATM services over an IP network. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4349: High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) Frames over Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3 (L2TPv3)
Proposed Standard- C. Pignataro
- M. Townsley
- February 2006
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3, (L2TPv3) defines a protocol for tunneling a variety of data link protocols over IP networks. This document describes the specifics of how to tunnel High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) frames over L2TPv3. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol, Version 3, (L2TPv3) defines a protocol for tunneling a variety of data link protocols over IP networks. This document describes the specifics of how to tunnel High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) frames over L2TPv3. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 4045: Extensions to Support Efficient Carrying of Multicast Traffic in Layer-2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
Experimental- G. Bourdon
- April 2005
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a method for tunneling PPP packets. This document describes an extension to L2TP, to make efficient use of L2TP tunnels within the context of deploying multicast services whose data will have to be conveyed by these tunnels. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a method for tunneling PPP packets. This document describes an extension to L2TP, to make efficient use of L2TP tunnels within the context of deploying multicast services whose data will have to be conveyed by these tunnels. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
RFC 3931: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3)
Proposed Standard- J. Lau
- M. Townsley
- I. Goyret
- March 2005
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document describes "version 3" of the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TPv3). L2TPv3 defines the base control protocol and encapsulation for tunneling multiple Layer 2 connections between two IP nodes. Additional documents detail the specifics for each data link type being emulated. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes "version 3" of the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TPv3). L2TPv3 defines the base control protocol and encapsulation for tunneling multiple Layer 2 connections between two IP nodes. Additional documents detail the specifics for each data link type being emulated. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3817: Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Active Discovery Relay for PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE)
Informational- W. Townsley
- R. da Silva
- June 2004
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP), facilitates the tunneling of PPP packets across an intervening packet-switched network. And yet a third protocol, PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE) describes how to build PPP sessions and to encapsulate PPP packets over Ethernet. L2TP Active Discovery Relay for PPPoE describes a method to relay Active Discovery and Service Selection functionality from PPPoE over the reliable control channel within L2TP. Two new L2TP control message types and associated PPPoE-specific Attribute Value Pairs (AVPs) for L2TP are defined. This relay mechanism provides enhanced integration of a specific feature in the PPPoE tunneling protocol with L2TP. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP), facilitates the tunneling of PPP packets across an intervening packet-switched network. And yet a third protocol, PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE) describes how to build PPP sessions and to encapsulate PPP packets over Ethernet. L2TP Active Discovery Relay for PPPoE describes a method to relay Active Discovery and Service Selection functionality from PPPoE over the reliable control channel within L2TP. Two new L2TP control message types and associated PPPoE-specific Attribute Value Pairs (AVPs) for L2TP are defined. This relay mechanism provides enhanced integration of a specific feature in the PPPoE tunneling protocol with L2TP. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 3573: Signalling of Modem-On-Hold status in Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
Proposed Standard- I. Goyret
- July 2003
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) defines a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. It is common for these PPP sessions to be established using modems connected over the public switched telephone network. One of the standards governing modem operation defines procedures that enable a client modem to put the call on hold and later, re-establish the modem link with minimal delay and without having to redial. While the modem call is on hold, the client phone line can be used to place or receive other calls. The L2TP base protocol does not provide any means to signal these events from the L2TP Access Controller (LAC), where the modem is physically connected, to the L2TP Network Server (LNS), where the PPP session is handled. This document describes a method to let the LNS know when a client modem connected to a LAC has placed the call on hold. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) defines a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. It is common for these PPP sessions to be established using modems connected over the public switched telephone network. One of the standards governing modem operation defines procedures that enable a client modem to put the call on hold and later, re-establish the modem link with minimal delay and without having to redial. While the modem call is on hold, the client phone line can be used to place or receive other calls. The L2TP base protocol does not provide any means to signal these events from the L2TP Access Controller (LAC), where the modem is physically connected, to the L2TP Network Server (LNS), where the PPP session is handled. This document describes a method to let the LNS know when a client modem connected to a LAC has placed the call on hold. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3437: Layer-Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions for PPP Link Control Protocol Negotiation
Proposed Standard- W. Palter
- W. Townsley
- January 2003
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document defines extensions to the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) for enhanced support of link-specific Point to Point Protocol (PPP) options. PPP endpoints typically have direct access to the common physical media connecting them and thus have detailed knowledge about the media that is in use. When the L2TP is used, the two PPP peers are no longer directly connected over the same physical media. Instead, L2TP inserts a virtual connection over some or all of the PPP connection by tunneling PPP frames over a packet switched network such as IP. Under some conditions, an L2TP endpoint may need to negotiate PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP) options at a location which may not have access to all of the media information necessary for proper participation in the LCP negotiation. This document provides a mechanism for communicating desired LCP options between L2TP endpoints in advance of PPP LCP negotiation at the far end of an L2TP tunnel, as well as a mechanism for communicating the negotiated LCP options back to where the native PPP link resides. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document defines extensions to the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) for enhanced support of link-specific Point to Point Protocol (PPP) options. PPP endpoints typically have direct access to the common physical media connecting them and thus have detailed knowledge about the media that is in use. When the L2TP is used, the two PPP peers are no longer directly connected over the same physical media. Instead, L2TP inserts a virtual connection over some or all of the PPP connection by tunneling PPP frames over a packet switched network such as IP. Under some conditions, an L2TP endpoint may need to negotiate PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP) options at a location which may not have access to all of the media information necessary for proper participation in the LCP negotiation. This document provides a mechanism for communicating desired LCP options between L2TP endpoints in advance of PPP LCP negotiation at the far end of an L2TP tunnel, as well as a mechanism for communicating the negotiated LCP options back to where the native PPP link resides. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3438: BCP 68: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations Update
Best Current Practice- W. Townsley
- December 2002
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document describes updates to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) considerations for the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Abstract
This document describes updates to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) considerations for the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
RFC 3308: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Differentiated Services Extension
Proposed Standard- P. Calhoun
- W. Luo
- D. McPherson
- K. Peirce
- November 2002
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a standard method
for tunneling PPP packets. The current specification provides no
provisions for supporting Differentiated Services (diffserv) over the
L2TP control connection or subsequent data sessions. As a result, no
standard mechanism currently exists within L2TP to provide L2TP
protocol negotiations for service discrimination.
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a standard method
for tunneling PPP packets. The current specification provides no
provisions for supporting Differentiated Services (diffserv) over the
L2TP control connection or subsequent data sessions. As a result, no
standard mechanism currently exists within L2TP to provide L2TP
protocol negotiations for service discrimination.
RFC 3355: Layer Two Tunnelling Protocol (L2TP) Over ATM Adaptation Layer 5 (AAL5)
Proposed Standard- A. Singh
- R. Turner
- R. Tio
- S. Nanji
- September 2002
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) [RFC2661] provides a standard
method for transporting the link layer of PPP [RFC1661] between a
dial-up server and a Network Access Server, using a network
connection in lieu of a physical point to point connection. This
document describes the use of an ATM network for the underlying
network connection. ATM User-Network Interface (UNI) Signalling
Specification Version 4.0 [SIG40] or Version 3.1 [SIG31] with ATM
Adaptation Layer 5 (AAL5) [ITU93] are supported as interfaces to the
ATM network.
Abstract
The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) [RFC2661] provides a standard
method for transporting the link layer of PPP [RFC1661] between a
dial-up server and a Network Access Server, using a network
connection in lieu of a physical point to point connection. This
document describes the use of an ATM network for the underlying
network connection. ATM User-Network Interface (UNI) Signalling
Specification Version 4.0 [SIG40] or Version 3.1 [SIG31] with ATM
Adaptation Layer 5 (AAL5) [ITU93] are supported as interfaces to the
ATM network.
RFC 3371: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP" Management Information Base
Proposed Standard- E. Caves
- P. Calhoun
- R. Wheeler
- September 2002
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets.
In particular, it defines objects for managing networks using Layer 2
Tunneling Protocol.
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets.
In particular, it defines objects for managing networks using Layer 2
Tunneling Protocol.
RFC 3301: Layer Two Tunnelling Protocol (L2TP): ATM access network extensions
Proposed Standard- Y. T'Joens
- P. Crivellari
- B. Sales
- June 2002
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
L2TP [RFC2661] specifies a protocol for tunnelling PPP packets over
packet based networks and over IP networks in particular. L2TP
[RFC2661] supports remote access by ISDN and PSTN networks. This
document augments the procedures described in [RFC2661] to further
support ATM SVC or PVC based access networks. The extensions defined
within this document allow for asymmetric bi-directional call
establishment and service selection in the ATM access network.
Abstract
L2TP [RFC2661] specifies a protocol for tunnelling PPP packets over
packet based networks and over IP networks in particular. L2TP
[RFC2661] supports remote access by ISDN and PSTN networks. This
document augments the procedures described in [RFC2661] to further
support ATM SVC or PVC based access networks. The extensions defined
within this document allow for asymmetric bi-directional call
establishment and service selection in the ATM access network.
RFC 3193: Securing L2TP using IPsec
Proposed Standard- B. Patel
- B. Aboba
- W. Dixon
- G. Zorn
- S. Booth
- November 2001
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document discusses how L2TP (Layer Two Tunneling Protocol) may utilize IPsec to provide for tunnel authentication, privacy protection, integrity checking and replay protection. Both the voluntary and compulsory tunneling cases are discussed. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document discusses how L2TP (Layer Two Tunneling Protocol) may utilize IPsec to provide for tunnel authentication, privacy protection, integrity checking and replay protection. Both the voluntary and compulsory tunneling cases are discussed. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3145: L2TP Disconnect Cause Information
Proposed Standard- R. Verma
- M. Verma
- J. Carlson
- July 2001
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document provides an extension to the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol ("L2TP"), a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document provides an extension to the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol ("L2TP"), a mechanism for tunneling Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) sessions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 3070: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) over Frame Relay
Proposed Standard- V. Rawat
- R. Tio
- S. Nanji
- R. Verma
- February 2001
- IETF publication
- Routing Area
Abstract
This document describes how L2TP is implemented over Frame Relay Permanent Virtual Circuits (PVCs) and Switched Virtual Circuits (SVCs). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes how L2TP is implemented over Frame Relay Permanent Virtual Circuits (PVCs) and Switched Virtual Circuits (SVCs). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
RFC 2888: Secure Remote Access with L2TP
Informational- P. Srisuresh
- August 2000
- Legacy publication
Abstract
The objective of this document is to extend security characteristics of IPsec to remote access users, as they dial-in through the Internet. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
The objective of this document is to extend security characteristics of IPsec to remote access users, as they dial-in through the Internet. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2809: Implementation of L2TP Compulsory Tunneling via RADIUS
Informational- B. Aboba
- G. Zorn
- April 2000
- IETF publication
- Operations and Management Area
Abstract
This document discusses implementation issues arising in the provisioning of compulsory tunneling in dial-up networks using the L2TP (Layer Two Tunneling Protocol) protocol. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Abstract
This document discusses implementation issues arising in the provisioning of compulsory tunneling in dial-up networks using the L2TP (Layer Two Tunneling Protocol) protocol. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
RFC 2661: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP"
Proposed Standard- W. Townsley
- A. Valencia
- A. Rubens
- G. Pall
- G. Zorn
- B. Palter
- August 1999
- IETF publication
- Internet Area
Abstract
This document describes the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Abstract
This document describes the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Subscribe to L2TP
Get notified when:
- RFC changes to status, obsoleted by, updates, updated by, or subseries.
- New RFC added to this subject or below
- The subject was merged into another.